Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Regularization Of Service with effect from the date of regularization. C.P.43-L/2021 to C.P.58-L/2021 Supreme Court Of Pakistan

REGULARIZATION OF SERVICE

Regularization Of Service with effect from the date of regularization. C.P.43-L/2021 to C.P.58-L/2021 Supreme Court Of Pakistan
 Regularization Of Service with effect from the date of regularization. C.P.43-L/2021 to C.P.58-L/2021 Supreme Court Of Pakistan


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN

(Re-appraising Jurisdiction)

Present

Mr. Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik    Justice

Mr. Justice  Syed Mansoor Ali Shah

Mr. Justice. Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan

 C.P.43-L/2021 to C.P.58-L/2021

(Against the request for Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore  dated 26-10-20, passed in appeal no 321 to 336 of 2020)

 

Appointee Director Food Faisalabad Division, Faisalabad, and so on

                                                                                                                (On the whole cases)

                                                                                                                                                                ...… .Petitioner(s)

Versus

Muhammad Tauqir Shah (In CP 43-L/2021) 

Waqar Ahmad (In CP 44-L/2021 

Muhammad Shahzad Hashmi (In CP 45-L/2021)

Aqeel Abbas Khan (In CP 46-L/202 

Muhammad Abu Bakkar Siddique (In CP 47-L/2021 

Asad mad (In CP 48-L/2021 

Shakeel Ahad Khan (In CP 49-L/2021 

Muhammad Imran (In CP 50-L/2021 

Muhammad Irfan (In CP 51-L/2021) 

Kashif Javaid (In CP 52-L/2021)

Muhammad Usman Haider (In CP 53-L/2021)

Muhammad Bilal (In CP 54-L/2021 

Aftab Ahmad Saghar (In CP 55-L/2021) 

Nakash Sabir (In CP 56-L/2021) 

Zia Akbar (In CP 57-L/2021) 

Saif Ullah (In CP 58-L/2021)

 

                                                                                                                                … .Respondent(s)

 

 

 

For the petitioner(s): Rana Shamshad Khan, Addl. A.G.

(On the whole cases)

For the respondent(s): Hafiz Tariq Nasim, ASC.

(On the whole cases)

Date of hearing: 10.03.2021

Request

 

Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, J.- The administrations of the respondents were in fact regularized under Punjab Regularization of Service Act, 2018 ("Act"), accordingly, the sole question before us is the assurance of the date of regularization C.P.43-L of 2021, and so on 2 .e., regardless of whether it is           from the date of regularization of the assistance of a representative or   whether from the date of the beginning arrangement of the on an agreement premise. The Punjab Service Tribunal through criticized united request date  26.10.2020 tracked down that the regularization of the respondents will be  the date of their beginning arrangement under the agreement, yet the criticized request has neglected to talk about the arrangements of the Act.

2. We have heard the learned insight for the gatherings and have gone through the arrangements of the aforementioned Act. The Act accommodates arrangements on the normal premise of workers serving on.1 The The act is relevant to people utilized in an office, who have finished three years constant help previously or after the beginning of the Act.2 "Regularization" under the The act implies the arrangement of a qualified agreement worker on the ordinary premise, with quick impact, as per the Act.3  The The act further gives that the agreement representatives who have      constantly been filling in as such for a period of at least three a long will be qualified to be considered for arrangement on a standard

premise if;

              (a) a normal opening distributed for beginning enrollment is accessible for regularization;

              (b) he is equipped for the post;

            (c) he has not been designated on an uncommon compensation bundle;]

          (d) his execution during the time of agreement has remained agreeable; and (e)                 he                     doesn't pick to proceed as agreement

                employee.

4 The method for regularization gave under the Act is that the agreement worker designated on the             proposals of the Punjab Public  be submitted to the selecting expert for regularization without                 reference to  the Commission or the Scrutiny Committee as comprised under Section

5 of the Act.   In any case, if the post in the question falls inside the domain of the  Commission and        thethe the contract worker is designated in any case then on the Commission for                                      recommendations5 and if the post is outside the domain of the Commission, the instance of an                 agreement worker will be put before the ScrutinyCommittee comprised under the Act for proposals.     The arrangements made  under segment 4 of the Act will be with quick effect

.6 The assistance delivered by an agreement a representative will not be meant pensionary benefits or         for some other reason whatsoever

.7 Contract worker, who isn't suggested for regularization by the Commission or, all  things                         considered, the Scrutiny Committee will be fired forthwith

.8 An agreement worker, who is regularized, will be put at the lower part of the rank rundown of the         individual unit and will rank junior to the next common servants

.9 An agreement representative, regularized under the Act will stop being administered by the Contract     Appointment Policy, 2004 and the terms and  states of the agreement and will be controlled under         Punjab Government  employees Act, 1974 and the guidelines outlined thereunder.10

3. The plan of the Act obviously shows that the regularization of an agreement is with prompt impact i.e., from the date of regularization. Learned insight for respondents has put independence on                 specific requests of this court in the  matter of regularization.

11 We have examined the said orders and seen that they didn't talk about the Act or  its arrangements     and the regularization in the said orders were based on the  Policy reported by the government,     in         this way, they are not important for     our motivations. The of the Act is unambiguous and                     plainly notice that    regularization will be with prompt impact i.e., from the date of terms.

 

Lahore,

tenth March 2021.

 

Endorsed for revealing

 

Iqbal

Judge

Judge

Judge

proposals of the Commission, the case will be alluded to


Post a Comment

0 Comments